Top
POLL POSITION
Best Marketing Events In April 2017
 
pollcode.com free polls
KEEPING SCORE

NFL 2017 First Round Draft Picks
1. Cleveland Browns
Garrett, Myles
DE 6'4" 272 Texas A&M
2. Chicago Bears (From 49ers)
Trubisky, Mitchell
QB 6'2" 222 North Carolina
3. San Francisco 49ers (From Bears)
Thomas, Solomon
DE 6'3" 273 Stanford
4. Jacksonville Jaguars
Fournette, Leonard
RB 6'0" 240 LSU
5. Tennessee Titans (From Rams)
Davis, Corey
WR 6'3" 209 Western Michigan
6. New York Jets
Adams, Jamal
S 6'0" 214 LSU
7. Los Angeles Chargers
Williams, Mike
WR 6'4" 218 Clemson
8. Carolina Panthers
McCaffrey, Christian
RB 5'11" 202 Stanford
9. Cincinnati Bengals
Ross, John
WR 5'11" 188 Washington
10. Kansas City Chiefs (From Bills)
Mahomes, Patrick
QB 6'2" 225 Texas Tech
11. New Orleans Saints
Lattimore, Marshon
CB 6'0" 193 Ohio St.
12. Houston Texans (From Browns through Eagles)
Watson, Deshaun
QB 6'2" 221 Clemson
13. Arizona Cardinals
Reddick, Haason
LB 6'1" 237 Temple
14. Philadelphia Eagles (From Vikings)
Barnett, Derek
DE 6'3" 259 Tennessee
15. Indianapolis Colts
Hooker, Malik
S 6'1" 206 Ohio St.
16. Baltimore Ravens
Humphrey, Marlon
CB 6'0" 197 Alabama
17. Washington Redskins
Allen, Jonathan
DE 6'3" 286 Alabama
18. Tennessee Titans
Jackson, Adoree'
CB 5'10" 186 USC
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Howard, O.J.
TE 6'6" 251 Alabama
20. Denver Broncos
Bolles, Garett
OT 6'5" 297 Utah
21. Detroit Lions
Davis, Jarrad
LB 6'1" 238 Florida
22. Miami Dolphins
Harris, Charles
OLB 6'3" n253 Missouri
23. New York Giants
Engram, Evan
TE 6'3" 234 Mississippi
24. Oakland Raiders
Conley, Gareon
CB 6’0” 195 Ohio St
25. Cleveland Browns (From Texans)
Peppers, Jabrill
S 5'11" 213 Michigan
26. Atlanta Falcons (From Seahawks)
McKinley, Takkarist
DE 6'2" 250 UCLA
27. Buffalo Bills (From Chiefs)
White, Tre'Davious
CB 5'11" 192 LSU
28. Dallas Cowboys
Charlton, Taco
DE 6'6" 277 Michigan
29 .Cleveland Browns (From Packers)
Njoku, David
TE 6'4" 246 Miami
30. Pittsburgh Steelers
Watt, T.J.
OLB 6'4" 252 Wisconsin
31. San Francisco 49ers (From Seahawks through Falcons)
Foster, Reuben
LB 6'0" 229 Alabama
32. New Orleans Saints (From Patriots)
Ramczyk, Ryan
OT 6'6" 310 Wisconsin

WHAT YOU SAY!?

ESPN’s 2017 Monday Night Football Schedule
Preseason
Thurs, Aug. 17
Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Jacksonville Jaguars 8 PM ET
Mon, Aug. 21
New York Giants at Cleveland Browns 8 PM ET

Regular Season (8 PM ET unless indicated)
Sept. 11
New Orleans Saints at Minnesota Vikings 7 PM ET
Los Angeles Chargers at Denver Broncos 10:15 PM ET
Sept. 18
Detroit Lions at New York Giants
Sept. 25
Dallas Cowboys at Arizona Cardinals
Oct. 2
Washington Redskins at Kansas City Chiefs
Oct. 9
Minnesota Vikings at Chicago Bears
Oct. 16
Indianapolis Colts at Tennessee Titans
Oct. 23
Washington Redskins at Philadelphia Eagles
Oct. 30
Denver Broncos at Kansas City Chiefs
Nov. 6
Detroit Lions at Green Bay Packers
Nov. 13
Miami Dolphins at Carolina Panthers
Nov. 20
Atlanta Falcons at Seattle Seahawks 
Nov. 27
Houston Texans at Baltimore Ravens 
Dec. 4
Pittsburgh Steelers at Cincinnati Bengals
Dec. 11
New England Patriots at Miami Dolphins
Dec. 18
Atlanta Falcons at Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Dec. 25
Oakland Raiders at Philadelphia Eagles

SEARCH

NYSportsJournalism.com + Topic Of Requested Search

COLLEGE

Coaches Make ACS Call
NCAA Plans '18 Final 4
Final Four '22 In NOLA
Cancer Drives Home
Nissan House Open

Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#46Ul8rBF4XpB4lo0.99
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#JZxA5jXY4rCwemgZ.99
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#JZxA5jXY4rCwemgZ.99
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#46Ul8rBF4XpB4lo0.99
Main
Monday
May242010

NFL Loses Legal Battle, But Still Looks To Win $4 Billion Licensing War

May 24, 2010: The NFL has lost a battle it believed it would win, not on the playing field but in the Supreme Court. But some analysts believe that the NFL will not lose the war itself.

The Supreme Court on May 24 ruled that the NFL could not have broad protection from antitrust lawsuits because it is 32 separate businesses and not a single entity when it comes to licensing. The 9-0 ruling was the result of a lawsuit filed in 2004 against the NFL by American Needle of Buffalo Grove, Ill., which had made and sold NFL-logo caps for more than 40 years. That deal came to an end in 2000 when the league signed an exclusive 10-year, $250 million licensing agreement with adidas division Reebok to produce NFL caps and apparel.

Sales of NFL licensed products is about $4 billion, according to industry analysts.

The ruling sends the case back to a district court, where legal experts said that American Needle has to prove that the NFL-Reebok deal was harmful to consumers either by creating higher prices for goods, by not allowing them to purchase the highest quality goods or other factors that could negatively impact NFL fans and others.

Using Super Bowl XLIV participants as an example, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote, "Directly relevant to this case, the teams compete in the market for intellectual property.  To a firm making hats, the [New Orleans] Saints and the [Indianapolis] Colts are two potentially competing suppliers of valuable trademarks.  When each NFL team licenses its intellectual property, it is not pursuing the 'common interests of the whole' league but is instead pursuing interests of each 'corporation itself . . . '"

The NFL had supported American Needle's decision to appeal to the Supreme Court two earlier lower court rulings that went in favor of the league, taking the strategy that a victory for the league in the nation's highest court would potentially lead to wins other antitrust lawsuits and also potentially reduce the number of future lawsuits. Major League Baseball is the only pro sports in the U.S. has antitrust status, but is still subject to lawsuits that take on a ruling was established by the Supreme Court in 1922.

American Needle has been in business since 1918 and first manufactured a hat for a Major League Baseball club in 1946 when it signed a deal with the Chicago Cubs. It still has a licensing deal with MLB and also manufactures hats for colleges, Tad Davis tennis and 85 of the world's top 100 golf clubs, per the company.

According to court papers, support for the NFL included Nascar, the NBA, NHL, NCAA and Major League Soccer. Players' associations in the NBA, NHL and Major League Baseball, as well as the NFL, were with American Needle. MLB itself did not commit official support for either side.

According to Justice Stevens, "The NFL teams do not possess either the unitary decision making quality or the single aggregation of economic power characteristic of independent action. Each of them is a substantial, independently owned, independently managed business, whose 'general corporate actions are guided or determined' by “separate corporate consciousness,' and whose 'objectives are' not 'common.' They compete with one another, not only on the playing field, but to attract fans, for gate receipts, and for contracts with managerial and playing personnel."

"[NFL teams] compete with one another, not only on the playing field, but to attract fans, for gate receipts, and for contracts with managerial and playing personnel."

Justice Stevens further wrote, "Directly relevant here, the teams are potentially competing suppliers in the market for intellectual property. When teams license such property, they are not pursuing the “common interests of the whole” league, but, instead, the interests of each 'corporation itself.'"

At least one analyst sees the NFL as taking this sack and making adjustments to move on.

"American Needle v. National Football League isn't a tenth as important as everyone is going to be telling you over the next few days," wrote Ted Frank, editor for PointofLaw.com. "Not only does it solely affect three or four sports entities, but nothing prevents those sports entities from reorganizing their structures to avoid the antitrust implications of this particular decision. For example, American Needle is suing the NFL because the latter (as it has done since 1963) pooled the 32 separate trademarks, owned by separate teams, into a single licensing deal."

Moving foward, according to Frank, "The NFL will face annoying litigation in the interim to defend this arrangement under the 'Rule of Reason,' but nothing prevents it from requiring teams from transferring ownership of team trademarks to the league as a condition of the franchise, and achieving the same economic result."

NFL Seeks Anti-Trust Licensing Ruling In Supreme Court

Back to NFL

Back to Home Page

Reader Comments (1)

Good work! Your post is an excellent example. Thank you!adidas basketball jerseys

March 15, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterCell phone

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>