Top
POLL POSITION
Best Event Of May 2016
 
pollcode.com free polls
WHAT YOU SAY!?

"I mean, we had 40 assists. That's a positive. But is that right? Nope. Never mind. (We had) 15. Sheesh. Way off." — Golden State Warriors guard Klay Thompson during a press conference, looking at the stat sheet following his team's 118-94 Game 4 loss to the Oklahoma City Thunder in the Western Conference Finals

SEARCH

NYSportsJournalism.com + Topic Of Requested Search

OLYMPICS

NBC $1B Milestone
USOC Marketing Goal
KT Tape Taps Games

Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#46Ul8rBF4XpB4lo0.99
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#JZxA5jXY4rCwemgZ.99
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#JZxA5jXY4rCwemgZ.99
Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer. Let us not seek to fix the blame for the past. Let us accept our own responsibility for the future.
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn121400.html#46Ul8rBF4XpB4lo0.99
Main
Monday
Jun292009

Supreme Court To Review Exclusivity Pact Between NFL-Reebok

June 30, 2009: In a move that could affect marketing, licensing and sponsorship deals throughout professional sports, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would review a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago that the National Football League and its 32 franchises did not engage in an illegal antitrust conspiracy by granting an exclusive trademark license to apparel manufacturer Reebok International, a division of adidas. The Court of Appeals in Chicago sided with an earlier decision by a lower court in a case filed by sports apparel manufacturer American Needle, based in Buffalo Grove, Ill., which sought to break the NFL's exclusive deal with Reebok, which was signed in 2001, on the grounds that it prevented fair trade and impeded competitive pricing. The Supreme Court agreed to review the decision despite the fact that the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division supported the ruling. Among other lines, American Needle produces a series of vintage baseball caps for Major League Baseball.

A deciding factor was that the NFL itself had urged the Supreme Court to become involved in order to clarify the league's position in its exclusive deals across the board. According to the NFL, there still were issues left unanswered that would open "the door to repeated, costly antitrust suits that burden not only the joint venture participants, but also the federal courts." The NFL said it sought a Supreme Court verdict “in an effort to secure a uniform rule that recognizes the single-entity nature of highly integrated joint venture and obviates the uncertainty, chilling effects, and forum shopping that inevitably results from the current conflict among the circuits.” A decision is likely not to come until after Super Bowl XLIV in February. Back to Home Page

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>